Exceptions to ORS 137.700 and 137.707
Source:
Section 137.712 — Exceptions to ORS 137.700 and 137.707, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors137.html
.
Notes of Decisions
“Conviction” refers to finding of guilt, not entry of judgment. State v. Isbell, 178 Or App 523, 38 P3d 272 (2001)
Evidence indicating that defendant does not qualify for downward departure from sentencing guidelines is not punishment-enhancing evidence requiring determination by jury. State v. Crescencio-Paz, 196 Or App 655, 103 P3d 666 (2004), Sup Ct review denied
Whether defendant represented by words or conduct that defendant possessed deadly weapon is determined by personal conduct of defendant, not by conduct of accomplice. State v. Arnold, 214 Or App 201, 164 P3d 334 (2007)
Juvenile violates condition of probation by committing “new crime” if juvenile is adjudicated to have committed act that would be crime if committed by adult. State v. Bowden, 217 Or App 133, 174 P3d 1073 (2007)
Where legislature intended “significant physical injury” to cover wide gap between what constitutes “physical injury” and “serious physical injury,” wound to face and scalp that is four to six inches in length and half an inch wide, with five staples not removed for approximately two weeks, and that is readily apparent to others is “serious and temporary disfigurement” that constitutes “significant physical injury.” State v. Drew, 302 Or App 232, 460 P3d 1032 (2020), Sup Ct. review denied
This section, which includes exception to ORS 163.175, is part of statutory scheme that contemplates three possible durations of impairment or disfigurement: temporary, prolonged and protracted, with “prolonged” to mean time period longer than “temporary” but shorter than “protracted.” State v. Stone, 326 Or App 200, 523 P3d 90 (2023), modified 328 Or App 203, 536 P3d 1094 (2023)
Law Review Citations
48 WLR 273 (2011); 23 LCLR 465 (2019)