ORS 197A.310
Cities with population of less than 10,000

  • rules

(1)

As an alternative to the method prescribed in ORS 197A.270 (Determination of housing capacity and accommodation of needed housing by cities with population of 25,000 or greater) (5)(a), the Land Conservation and Development Commission shall adopt a method by which a city outside Metro that has a population of less than 10,000 may evaluate or amend its urban growth boundary.

(2)

The commission shall design the method so that:

(a)

A city using the method:

(A)

Will have within its boundaries sufficient buildable lands and other development capacity, including land and capacity for needed housing and employment opportunities, to meet the growth in population and employment forecast to occur over a 14-year period.

(B)

Will not become less efficient in its use of land as a result of a change to the urban growth boundary.

(b)

The urban population per square mile will continue, subject to market conditions, to increase over time on a statewide basis and in major regions of the state, including that portion of the Willamette Valley outside of Metro.

(c)

The rate of conversion of agricultural and forest lands to urban uses does not increase over time in any major region of the state.

(3)

Under the method adopted by the commission:

(a)

A city’s determination of the amount of buildable lands sufficient for needed housing, employment and other urban uses must be based on the population and employment growth forecast to occur over a 14-year period.

(b)

A city’s determination of the supply and development capacity of lands within its urban growth boundary must be based on:

(A)

A simple inventory of vacant and partially vacant buildable lands within the urban growth boundary;

(B)

The comprehensive plan designation and the zoning of the portion of the buildable lands that is urban; and

(C)

Simple factors established by the commission for forecasting:
(i)
The development and redevelopment capacity of urbanizable lands within the urban growth boundary; and
(ii)
The redevelopment capacity of developed urban lands within the urban growth boundary.

(c)

A city’s determination of the supply and development capacity of lands the city proposes to include within the urban growth boundary must be based on:

(A)

A simple inventory of vacant and partially vacant lands; and

(B)

Simple factors established by the commission for forecasting the development and redevelopment capacity of the lands.

(d)

A city shall demonstrate that lands included within the urban growth boundary:

(A)

Include sufficient serviceable land for at least a seven-year period.

(B)

Can all be serviceable over a 14-year period.

(e)

Lands included within the urban growth boundary:

(A)

Must be planned and zoned for categories of land uses in amounts that are roughly proportional to the land need determined for each category of use;

(B)

Must be planned and zoned for an intensity of use that is generally consistent with the estimates that were used to determine the amount of land needed;

(C)

Must be planned and zoned to meet the requirements for needed housing, and those requirements must be specified by rule of the commission in a manner that is as objective as practicable; and

(D)

May be either:
(i)
Planned and zoned, or otherwise conditioned, to avoid significantly affecting a state highway, a state highway interchange or a freight route designated in the Oregon Highway Plan; or
(ii)
Allowed to significantly affect a state highway, a state highway interchange or a freight route designated in the Oregon Highway Plan subject to mitigation, consistent with rules of the commission, if the lands are planned and zoned for compact urban development or industrial uses.

(4)

For purposes of subsection (3)(a) of this section, population growth must be forecast as provided in ORS 195.033 (Area population forecasts). Employment growth must be forecast based on the population growth forecast for the city or the employment growth forecast issued by the Employment Department for the county or region. The commission shall establish factors, by rule, for converting the forecasted population and employment growth into forecasts of land need for housing, employment and other categories of uses. The factors must:

(a)

Be based on an empirical evaluation of the relation between population and employment growth and the rate and trends of land utilization in the recent past in the applicable major region of the state;

(b)

Reflect consideration by the commission of any significant changes occurring or expected to occur in the markets for urban land uses in that major region of the state;

(c)

Be designed to encourage an increase in the land use efficiency of a city, subject to market conditions; and

(d)

Provide a range of policy choices for a city about the form of its future growth.

(5)

For purposes of subsection (3)(b) of this section, the commission shall establish factors for supply and development capacity that are:

(a)

Based on an empirical evaluation of the population and employment growth that has occurred on similarly situated lands through development and redevelopment;

(b)

Based on consideration by the commission of any significant changes occurring or expected to occur in the markets for urban land uses in that major region of the state;

(c)

Designed to encourage an increase in the land use efficiency of the city, subject to market conditions; and

(d)

Designed to provide a range of policy choices for a city about the form of its future growth.

(6)

For purposes of subsection (3)(c) of this section, the commission shall establish factors that are:

(a)

Based on an empirical evaluation of the population and employment growth that has occurred on similarly situated lands through development and redevelopment;

(b)

Based on consideration by the commission of any significant changes occurring or expected to occur in the markets for urban land uses in each major region of the state;

(c)

Designed to encourage an increase in the land use efficiency of the city, subject to market conditions; and

(d)

Designed to provide a range of policy choices for a city about the form of its future growth.

(7)

For lands that are included within an urban growth boundary pursuant to this section and not made serviceable within 20 years after the date of their inclusion, the commission may provide by rule that:

(a)

The lands must be removed from within the urban growth boundary the next time the city evaluates the urban growth boundary; or

(b)

The planned development capacity of the lands must be reduced if there are significant increases in the cost of making the lands serviceable.

(8)

When lands included within the urban growth boundary pursuant to this section are planned and zoned for industrial or residential uses, the lands must remain planned and zoned for the use unless a rule of the commission allows a change in planning and zoning based on a significant change in circumstance. [2013 c.575 §4; 2013 c.575 §9; 2023 c.13 §93]

Source: Section 197A.310 — Cities with population of less than 10,000; rules, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors197A.­html.

197A.015
Definitions for ORS 197.475 to 197.493 and ORS chapter 197A
197A.018
Definition of “needed housing.”
197A.020
Limitations on requiring contribution for government assisted housing
197A.025
Policy
197A.030
Department support to local governments to incentivize needed housing
197A.100
Housing production strategy
197A.103
Review of housing production strategy
197A.110
City report on housing permitting and production
197A.115
City report on implementation of housing production strategy
197A.130
Identification of cities with unmet housing needs
197A.200
Local government planning for needed housing
197A.205
Housing and Community Services Department review of certain local housing measures
197A.210
Development-ready lands
197A.215
Application to remove property from within urban growth boundary
197A.230
Definitions for ORS 197A.230 to 197A.250
197A.232
Findings regarding long-range planning
197A.235
Designation of rural and urban reserves pursuant to intergovernmental agreement
197A.242
Coordinated and concurrent process for designation of urban and rural reserves
197A.245
Urban reserves
197A.250
Designation of certain Washington County lands
197A.270
Determination of housing capacity and accommodation of needed housing by cities with population of 25,000 or greater
197A.278
Lane County accommodation of needed housing
197A.280
Determination of housing capacity and accommodation of needed housing by cities with population of less than 25,000
197A.285
Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundaries
197A.300
Definition of “serviceable.”
197A.302
Purposes
197A.305
Alternative amendment process
197A.310
Cities with population of less than 10,000
197A.312
Cities with population of 10,000 or greater
197A.315
Expansion study areas
197A.325
Review of final decision of city
197A.335
Determination of housing capacity and accommodation of needed housing by Metro cities
197A.348
Definition of “needed housing.”
197A.350
Determination of housing capacity and accommodation of needed housing by Metro
197A.355
Priority of land to be included within Metro urban growth boundary
197A.358
Metro urban growth boundary designation
197A.362
Timing of Metro accommodation of needed housing
197A.365
Metro housing coordination strategy
197A.370
Metro report of performance measures
197A.372
Metro evaluation of accommodation of needed housing
197A.395
Limits on local government prohibitions
197A.400
Clear and objective approval criteria required
197A.420
Duplexes
197A.425
Accessory dwelling units
197A.430
Single room occupancies
197A.445
Affordable housing allowed outright
197A.460
Residential use of commercial lands for affordable housing
197A.465
Local requirements to develop affordable housing
197A.470
Final action on affordable housing application
197A.500
Definitions for ORS 197A.500 to 197A.521
197A.502
Legislative findings
197A.503
Preemptive effect of ORS 197A.500 to 197A.521
197A.505
Establishment of criteria for decisions in land use final order
197A.507
Procedure for review of established criteria
197A.509
Development of land use final order
197A.511
Land use final order
197A.513
Plan amendments
197A.515
Land Use Board of Appeals review of land use final order
197A.517
Supreme Court review of Land Use Board of Appeals opinion on land use final order
197A.519
Amendments to land use final order
197A.521
Failure to meet timeline
Green check means up to date. Up to date
 



OSZAR »